<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 435 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208203</link>
    <description>A departmental circular issued after the Tribunal&#039;s order led the Supreme Court to set aside the impugned order and remit the matter for fresh decision in light of Circular No. 58/1/2002-CX dated 15 January 2002. The Court proceeded on the parties&#039; agreement that the circular should be considered by the Tribunal and directed reconsideration accordingly. All contentions were left open for determination on remand, with no costs order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 435 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208203</link>
      <description>A departmental circular issued after the Tribunal&#039;s order led the Supreme Court to set aside the impugned order and remit the matter for fresh decision in light of Circular No. 58/1/2002-CX dated 15 January 2002. The Court proceeded on the parties&#039; agreement that the circular should be considered by the Tribunal and directed reconsideration accordingly. All contentions were left open for determination on remand, with no costs order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>