<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 782 - ITAT, LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208188</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the CIT lacked jurisdiction to cancel the registration granted to the appellant society under section 12A of the IT Act. The ITAT emphasized that the CIT&#039;s power to cancel registration was not retrospective and did not apply to trusts registered before the relevant amendments. The appeal succeeded based on the lack of jurisdiction in the CIT&#039;s order, leading to the quashing of the cancellation of registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 782 - ITAT, LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208188</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the CIT lacked jurisdiction to cancel the registration granted to the appellant society under section 12A of the IT Act. The ITAT emphasized that the CIT&#039;s power to cancel registration was not retrospective and did not apply to trusts registered before the relevant amendments. The appeal succeeded based on the lack of jurisdiction in the CIT&#039;s order, leading to the quashing of the cancellation of registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>