<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 822 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions of Rs. 50.09 lakhs as &#039;old brought forward trade credits&#039; and Rs. 14.99 lakhs as &#039;current year&#039;s trade credits&#039; under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the liabilities and did not provide satisfactory explanations for the credits. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the interest charged under Section 234B, stating that it should be levied on the assessed income, not the returned income. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 822 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions of Rs. 50.09 lakhs as &#039;old brought forward trade credits&#039; and Rs. 14.99 lakhs as &#039;current year&#039;s trade credits&#039; under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the liabilities and did not provide satisfactory explanations for the credits. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the interest charged under Section 234B, stating that it should be levied on the assessed income, not the returned income. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>