https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208176 The Court declined to interfere with the Sessions Court's order reducing the additional cash security required as a condition for permission to travel abroad. Although the Sessions Court should not have recorded that the reduction was made with the consent of both sides without written consent, the reduction of the security amount to Rs. 6 lakhs was found justified. The applicant's request to further reduce or substitute the security with another form of assurance was rejected, as no sufficient ground for further interference was made out. en-us Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208176 The Court declined to interfere with the Sessions Court's order reducing the additional cash security required as a condition for permission to travel abroad. Although the Sessions Court should not have recorded that the reduction was made with the consent of both sides without written consent, the reduction of the security amount to Rs. 6 lakhs was found justified. The applicant's request to further reduce or substitute the security with another form of assurance was rejected, as no sufficient ground for further interference was made out. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208176