<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 625 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208171</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the reduced penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed by the Appellate Tribunal under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court found no substantial questions of law for examination and affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating the appellant benefitted from the reduced penalty despite being found involved in abetting misdeclaration and over-valuation of goods. The penalty was upheld, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s role as an abettor in the exporter&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 625 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208171</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the reduced penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed by the Appellate Tribunal under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court found no substantial questions of law for examination and affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating the appellant benefitted from the reduced penalty despite being found involved in abetting misdeclaration and over-valuation of goods. The penalty was upheld, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s role as an abettor in the exporter&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>