https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208163 The Tribunal upheld duty liability on the cleared Sugar but set aside penalties under Section 11AC, noting no intent to evade duty. The redemption fine for confiscation of goods and lorries was upheld due to lack of duty paying documents. The penalty under Rule 25 for failure to record cleared Sugar in the RG-1 Register was upheld, while the penalty on an individual under Rule 26 was set aside, as there was no belief in duty evasion. The Tribunal disposed of both appeals, setting aside penalties under Section 11AC and Rule 26, but upholding penalties under Rule 25. en-us Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208163 The Tribunal upheld duty liability on the cleared Sugar but set aside penalties under Section 11AC, noting no intent to evade duty. The redemption fine for confiscation of goods and lorries was upheld due to lack of duty paying documents. The penalty under Rule 25 for failure to record cleared Sugar in the RG-1 Register was upheld, while the penalty on an individual under Rule 26 was set aside, as there was no belief in duty evasion. The Tribunal disposed of both appeals, setting aside penalties under Section 11AC and Rule 26, but upholding penalties under Rule 25. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208163