<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 893 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208162</link>
    <description>Admitted inadmissible CENVAT credit and corresponding interest were treated as settled under the statutory settlement scheme because the dues had been fully paid and the Revenue raised no objection after verification. The Commission granted settlement of duty and interest accordingly. Because the credit had been knowingly availed, total immunity from penal consequences was declined; however, prompt payment, cooperation during investigation and settlement, and unconditional clearance of the goods were treated as mitigating factors. Fine was not imposed, limited penalty relief was granted, and immunity from prosecution was granted under the settlement provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 893 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208162</link>
      <description>Admitted inadmissible CENVAT credit and corresponding interest were treated as settled under the statutory settlement scheme because the dues had been fully paid and the Revenue raised no objection after verification. The Commission granted settlement of duty and interest accordingly. Because the credit had been knowingly availed, total immunity from penal consequences was declined; however, prompt payment, cooperation during investigation and settlement, and unconditional clearance of the goods were treated as mitigating factors. Fine was not imposed, limited penalty relief was granted, and immunity from prosecution was granted under the settlement provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>