<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 805 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act and allow the insurance premium amount not directly related to business. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between exempt income and deduction from income in determining the applicability of section 14A, based on previous judgments and the direct nexus between the premium paid and the sales of the assessee society. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 805 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act and allow the insurance premium amount not directly related to business. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between exempt income and deduction from income in determining the applicability of section 14A, based on previous judgments and the direct nexus between the premium paid and the sales of the assessee society. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>