<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 812 - ITAT, Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete disallowances made under section 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding payments for commission, incentives, and consultancy charges. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer failed to prove the excessiveness or unreasonableness of the payments compared to fair market value, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on January 8, 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 812 - ITAT, Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete disallowances made under section 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding payments for commission, incentives, and consultancy charges. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer failed to prove the excessiveness or unreasonableness of the payments compared to fair market value, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on January 8, 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>