https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208140 The appeal was allowed on the ground of limitation as the Tribunal found that the demand for Service Tax on Postal charges incurred by the assessee was time-barred. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant had started paying Service Tax on such charges post-April 2006 and had a reasonable belief that they were not liable to pay Service Tax based on a previous ruling in their favor. The decision was made due to the lack of evidence of suppression or misdeclaration to evade duty, and differing interpretations of the law regarding the charges. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208140 The appeal was allowed on the ground of limitation as the Tribunal found that the demand for Service Tax on Postal charges incurred by the assessee was time-barred. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant had started paying Service Tax on such charges post-April 2006 and had a reasonable belief that they were not liable to pay Service Tax based on a previous ruling in their favor. The decision was made due to the lack of evidence of suppression or misdeclaration to evade duty, and differing interpretations of the law regarding the charges. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208140