<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 457 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208139</link>
    <description>The judgment focused on the applicability of Notification No.12/2003-ST on photography services, the validity of invoking Section 84 during an appeal, and the benefit of abatement of goods&#039; cost from the taxable value. The conflicting tribunal decisions led to a reference to a Larger Bench. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit Rs.7.5 lakhs within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 457 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208139</link>
      <description>The judgment focused on the applicability of Notification No.12/2003-ST on photography services, the validity of invoking Section 84 during an appeal, and the benefit of abatement of goods&#039; cost from the taxable value. The conflicting tribunal decisions led to a reference to a Larger Bench. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit Rs.7.5 lakhs within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>