<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 162 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal with consequential relief, emphasizing that the delay in refund processing was not due to lack of documents. The appellant was found eligible for interest as claimed, with the Tribunal overturning the rejection of refund claims based on procedural grounds and unjust enrichment. The matter was remanded to the original authority for a decision on the refund after the necessary documents are produced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 162 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal with consequential relief, emphasizing that the delay in refund processing was not due to lack of documents. The appellant was found eligible for interest as claimed, with the Tribunal overturning the rejection of refund claims based on procedural grounds and unjust enrichment. The matter was remanded to the original authority for a decision on the refund after the necessary documents are produced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>