<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 805 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal by restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions concerning suspicious share transactions, emphasizing the importance of considering surrounding circumstances. However, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s reductions in disallowances related to vehicle running and telephone expenses, deeming the adjustments reasonable and justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 805 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal by restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions concerning suspicious share transactions, emphasizing the importance of considering surrounding circumstances. However, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s reductions in disallowances related to vehicle running and telephone expenses, deeming the adjustments reasonable and justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>