<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 154 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208096</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, based on the interpretation of the exemption notification conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 154 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208096</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, based on the interpretation of the exemption notification conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>