https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208093 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the application of Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on spent sulphuric acid. The demand for payment was set aside as the rule was deemed not applicable to fully exempt by-products. The requirement for maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted final products was also waived due to the impracticality in this specific scenario. The duty demand against the appellant was found unjustified and set aside, with the Tribunal allowing the appeal and overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order. en-us Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208093 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the application of Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on spent sulphuric acid. The demand for payment was set aside as the rule was deemed not applicable to fully exempt by-products. The requirement for maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted final products was also waived due to the impracticality in this specific scenario. The duty demand against the appellant was found unjustified and set aside, with the Tribunal allowing the appeal and overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208093