<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 805 - ITAT, LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in ITA Nos. 675, 676, and 677/Luck/2010, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directing the AO to permit the appellant&#039;s claim for accumulation under section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal found the provisions of section 11(2) inapplicable as the appellant had met the requirements of section 11(1)(a) by utilizing more than 85% of its income for charitable purposes, thus justifying the accumulation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 805 - ITAT, LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in ITA Nos. 675, 676, and 677/Luck/2010, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directing the AO to permit the appellant&#039;s claim for accumulation under section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal found the provisions of section 11(2) inapplicable as the appellant had met the requirements of section 11(1)(a) by utilizing more than 85% of its income for charitable purposes, thus justifying the accumulation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>