<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 897 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208057</link>
    <description>Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 applies only when inputs or capital goods are removed as such from the factory. Used machinery that had remained in the factory for more than a year before its initial sale was not treated as removed as such merely because it was later returned after the aborted sale. Its eventual disposal was linked to its original entry into the factory, so the reversal of credit was not warranted. Duty paid on the final sale value was proper.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 897 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208057</link>
      <description>Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 applies only when inputs or capital goods are removed as such from the factory. Used machinery that had remained in the factory for more than a year before its initial sale was not treated as removed as such merely because it was later returned after the aborted sale. Its eventual disposal was linked to its original entry into the factory, so the reversal of credit was not warranted. Duty paid on the final sale value was proper.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>