<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 451 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, disallowing the section 14A adjustment and the addition suggested by the Transfer Pricing Officer. The issue regarding the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) credit was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 451 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, disallowing the section 14A adjustment and the addition suggested by the Transfer Pricing Officer. The issue regarding the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) credit was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>