https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208038 The Tribunal rejected the department's appeal, upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order, and emphasized the necessity of demonstrating a clear nexus between input and output services for refund eligibility under the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The Tribunal also disposed of the cross objection, stay petition, and application for condonation of delay. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208038 The Tribunal rejected the department's appeal, upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order, and emphasized the necessity of demonstrating a clear nexus between input and output services for refund eligibility under the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The Tribunal also disposed of the cross objection, stay petition, and application for condonation of delay. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208038