<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 450 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208036</link>
    <description>At the interim stage of a service tax appeal involving alleged Business Auxiliary Service and reimbursement-related amounts, the Tribunal found a prima facie case that the commission and reimbursement components could form part of taxable consideration. To protect the Revenue&#039;s interest, it directed a substantial pre-deposit as a condition for stay of recovery. The appeal was made subject to deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs, and recovery of the balance demand was stayed during pendency, provided the condition was complied with. The arrangement was expressly interim and did not finally decide the service tax liability on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 08:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 450 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208036</link>
      <description>At the interim stage of a service tax appeal involving alleged Business Auxiliary Service and reimbursement-related amounts, the Tribunal found a prima facie case that the commission and reimbursement components could form part of taxable consideration. To protect the Revenue&#039;s interest, it directed a substantial pre-deposit as a condition for stay of recovery. The appeal was made subject to deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs, and recovery of the balance demand was stayed during pendency, provided the condition was complied with. The arrangement was expressly interim and did not finally decide the service tax liability on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>