<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 140 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed one appeal and disposed of the other, reducing fines and penalties. The original authority was directed to re-calculate duty amounts and interest, with confiscation of goods upheld but fines reduced to Rs. 50,000. Penalty on the appellant was reduced to Rs. 50,000, and penalty on the Managing Director vacated. Stay petitions were also disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 140 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed one appeal and disposed of the other, reducing fines and penalties. The original authority was directed to re-calculate duty amounts and interest, with confiscation of goods upheld but fines reduced to Rs. 50,000. Penalty on the appellant was reduced to Rs. 50,000, and penalty on the Managing Director vacated. Stay petitions were also disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>