https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208025 The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's repeated failure to comply with the stay order issued by the Commissioner (Appeals), resulting in delayed deposits well beyond specified deadlines. Despite multiple extensions granted by the Tribunal, the appellant continued to delay payment, leading to the dismissal of the appeal based on non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory requirements and directed the appellant to deposit an additional Rs. 2 lakhs within six weeks to potentially reinstate the appeal, subject to compliance verification. en-us Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jan 2012 08:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208025 The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's repeated failure to comply with the stay order issued by the Commissioner (Appeals), resulting in delayed deposits well beyond specified deadlines. Despite multiple extensions granted by the Tribunal, the appellant continued to delay payment, leading to the dismissal of the appeal based on non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory requirements and directed the appellant to deposit an additional Rs. 2 lakhs within six weeks to potentially reinstate the appeal, subject to compliance verification. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208025