<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 125 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208018</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s revision of the assessment order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the proper application of law in assessing deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e). The Court remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for a fresh review, highlighting the necessity of considering all available records and adhering to legal principles without biases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 125 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208018</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s revision of the assessment order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the proper application of law in assessing deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e). The Court remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for a fresh review, highlighting the necessity of considering all available records and adhering to legal principles without biases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>