<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 889 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208013</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the case back to the Tribunal for a comprehensive review, emphasizing the need to consider issues of limitation, jurisdiction, and the inclusion of capital gains in computing book profits. The Court highlighted the importance of addressing all legal aspects before reaching a final decision on the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 889 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208013</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the case back to the Tribunal for a comprehensive review, emphasizing the need to consider issues of limitation, jurisdiction, and the inclusion of capital gains in computing book profits. The Court highlighted the importance of addressing all legal aspects before reaching a final decision on the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>