<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 888 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208012</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act and restored the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer. However, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the penalty amount based on the assessed income of Rs. 9,90,994. The departmental appeal was allowed partly, with instructions for the penalty to be computed in accordance with the assessed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 888 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208012</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act and restored the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer. However, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the penalty amount based on the assessed income of Rs. 9,90,994. The departmental appeal was allowed partly, with instructions for the penalty to be computed in accordance with the assessed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>