<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 444 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208002</link>
    <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit in a service tax stay application requires a strong prima facie case. On the available contract and adjudication findings, the arrangement appeared to be supply of manpower rather than a pure agent arrangement, so the appellant did not establish entitlement to full waiver at the interim stage. The question whether the appellant could ultimately be treated as a pure agent was left open for final hearing. Partial waiver was therefore granted and the balance demand was stayed subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 444 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208002</link>
      <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit in a service tax stay application requires a strong prima facie case. On the available contract and adjudication findings, the arrangement appeared to be supply of manpower rather than a pure agent arrangement, so the appellant did not establish entitlement to full waiver at the interim stage. The question whether the appellant could ultimately be treated as a pure agent was left open for final hearing. Partial waiver was therefore granted and the balance demand was stayed subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>