<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 105 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207955</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding decisions by the CIT (A) and Tribunal in favor of the assessee. The court ruled that the addition of Rs. 31,26,718 for unexplained cash discount and the disallowance of commission payments to 16 persons were unjustified. It emphasized the importance of considering factual positions and evidence in tax disputes and respecting business decisions within the legal framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 105 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207955</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding decisions by the CIT (A) and Tribunal in favor of the assessee. The court ruled that the addition of Rs. 31,26,718 for unexplained cash discount and the disallowance of commission payments to 16 persons were unjustified. It emphasized the importance of considering factual positions and evidence in tax disputes and respecting business decisions within the legal framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>