<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 613 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207943</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of deferred revenue expenditure back to the Assessing Officer for reassessment. The write-off of non/slow-moving inventory items was permitted based on consistency with previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of assessing the bona fides of the accounting method change and considering expert opinions before reaching a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 613 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207943</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of deferred revenue expenditure back to the Assessing Officer for reassessment. The write-off of non/slow-moving inventory items was permitted based on consistency with previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of assessing the bona fides of the accounting method change and considering expert opinions before reaching a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>