<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 777 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207939</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for claiming depreciation on assets &#039;kept ready&#039; for use, citing the lack of clear provisions against such claims and emphasizing that penalties should not be imposed for technical breaches. The judgment was delivered on 08/01/2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 777 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207939</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for claiming depreciation on assets &#039;kept ready&#039; for use, citing the lack of clear provisions against such claims and emphasizing that penalties should not be imposed for technical breaches. The judgment was delivered on 08/01/2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>