<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 479 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207938</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to consider the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, in light of Section 80. The Tribunal confirmed the adjudication on other grounds, stressing the importance of a fair hearing for the Appellant and the authority&#039;s duty to assess the penalty appropriately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 479 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207938</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to consider the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, in light of Section 80. The Tribunal confirmed the adjudication on other grounds, stressing the importance of a fair hearing for the Appellant and the authority&#039;s duty to assess the penalty appropriately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>