https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207937 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding refund claims under the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, emphasizing the requirement for re-quantification based on a relevant Circular. It determined that the orders were not remand orders but necessitated compliance with the Circular for examining refund claims. The Tribunal rejected the department's appeals, stating that the orders did not constitute remand orders as argued. It also disposed of cross objections and stay applications, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. en-us Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207937 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding refund claims under the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, emphasizing the requirement for re-quantification based on a relevant Circular. It determined that the orders were not remand orders but necessitated compliance with the Circular for examining refund claims. The Tribunal rejected the department's appeals, stating that the orders did not constitute remand orders as argued. It also disposed of cross objections and stay applications, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207937