<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 430 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, quashing the impugned order and disposing of the appeal accordingly. The demand under section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was deemed invalid as the amount collected by the appellants was found to be in compliance with the Incentive Scheme&#039;s provisions, and not exceeding the permissible limit under the exemption notifications. The Tribunal held that the recovery of the alleged excess duty amount was not justified, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s claim for Rs.28,01,370.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 430 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, quashing the impugned order and disposing of the appeal accordingly. The demand under section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was deemed invalid as the amount collected by the appellants was found to be in compliance with the Incentive Scheme&#039;s provisions, and not exceeding the permissible limit under the exemption notifications. The Tribunal held that the recovery of the alleged excess duty amount was not justified, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s claim for Rs.28,01,370.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>