https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207922 The Tribunal confirmed a duty demand on Unit 2 for manufacturing finished goods not covered by a specific notification, citing an amendment to the notification. Penalty equal to duty and interest were imposed on Unit 2. However, written submissions argued that previous decisions favored the appellant. The Tribunal considered precedent cases and held that when goods are manufactured on a job work basis following CENVAT Credit Rules, no duty can be demanded. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of following established legal precedents in resolving disputes related to duty demands and manufacturing processes under relevant notifications. en-us Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207922 The Tribunal confirmed a duty demand on Unit 2 for manufacturing finished goods not covered by a specific notification, citing an amendment to the notification. Penalty equal to duty and interest were imposed on Unit 2. However, written submissions argued that previous decisions favored the appellant. The Tribunal considered precedent cases and held that when goods are manufactured on a job work basis following CENVAT Credit Rules, no duty can be demanded. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of following established legal precedents in resolving disputes related to duty demands and manufacturing processes under relevant notifications. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207922