<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 92 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207920</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed without costs, affirming the tribunal&#039;s rulings on the valuation of scrap and the inclusion of payment to the tenant in capital gains computation. The issue of payment to employees was remitted to the Assessing Officer for further examination due to conflicting findings and insufficient initial scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 92 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207920</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed without costs, affirming the tribunal&#039;s rulings on the valuation of scrap and the inclusion of payment to the tenant in capital gains computation. The issue of payment to employees was remitted to the Assessing Officer for further examination due to conflicting findings and insufficient initial scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>