<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 418 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207906</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed a service tax demand and penalties under sections 78 and 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, against the appellants for arranging finances/loans for car customers. The Tribunal considered precedents but ultimately set aside the penalties, following the decision in a similar case. The judgment emphasized that the issue was a bona fide interpretation of the law without any mala fide intent or suppression, leading to the disposal of the appeal without penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 418 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207906</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed a service tax demand and penalties under sections 78 and 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, against the appellants for arranging finances/loans for car customers. The Tribunal considered precedents but ultimately set aside the penalties, following the decision in a similar case. The judgment emphasized that the issue was a bona fide interpretation of the law without any mala fide intent or suppression, leading to the disposal of the appeal without penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>