<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 866 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Cenvat credit and penalty imposition on the appellant for availing credit based on allegedly bogus invoices from M/s. Ganpati Trade Links. Despite the appellant&#039;s claim of receiving goods from a different supplier, M/s. Rajdhani Metals, the Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s involvement in the transaction indicated liability. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty and credit disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 866 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Cenvat credit and penalty imposition on the appellant for availing credit based on allegedly bogus invoices from M/s. Ganpati Trade Links. Despite the appellant&#039;s claim of receiving goods from a different supplier, M/s. Rajdhani Metals, the Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s involvement in the transaction indicated liability. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty and credit disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>