<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 763 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207901</link>
    <description>Sales promotion service was treated as an input service under Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, supporting eligibility for Cenvat credit on service tax paid for such services. Relying on the prevailing judicial interpretation, the Tribunal found that this position created a strong prima facie case for the appellant. On that basis, the appellant was granted waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty, and recovery proceedings were stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 763 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207901</link>
      <description>Sales promotion service was treated as an input service under Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, supporting eligibility for Cenvat credit on service tax paid for such services. Relying on the prevailing judicial interpretation, the Tribunal found that this position created a strong prima facie case for the appellant. On that basis, the appellant was granted waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty, and recovery proceedings were stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>