<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 304 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207899</link>
    <description>A predeposit order under the Customs Act was sustained where the Tribunal recorded adequate prima facie reasons, including discrepancies in export valuation, overseas entry documents, a textile research report, and cancelled DEPB licences linked to forged bank realisation certificates; complete waiver was therefore refused for the firm. The partner&#039;s predeposit was separately considered on the facts, and the higher deposit requirement was set aside in his case because the totality of circumstances justified individualised relief. The firm&#039;s deposit direction remained in force, with time for compliance extended.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 304 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207899</link>
      <description>A predeposit order under the Customs Act was sustained where the Tribunal recorded adequate prima facie reasons, including discrepancies in export valuation, overseas entry documents, a textile research report, and cancelled DEPB licences linked to forged bank realisation certificates; complete waiver was therefore refused for the firm. The partner&#039;s predeposit was separately considered on the facts, and the higher deposit requirement was set aside in his case because the totality of circumstances justified individualised relief. The firm&#039;s deposit direction remained in force, with time for compliance extended.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>