<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 415 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207896</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals due to the lack of substantial evidence, arbitrary adjudication, and failure to follow due process. The judgment emphasized the importance of legal sanctity in evidence, the need for corroborative evidence, and adherence to principles of natural justice in adjudication processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 415 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207896</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals due to the lack of substantial evidence, arbitrary adjudication, and failure to follow due process. The judgment emphasized the importance of legal sanctity in evidence, the need for corroborative evidence, and adherence to principles of natural justice in adjudication processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>