<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 759 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and allowed the cross objection by the assessee. The Tribunal directed the AO to apply the GP estimated at the average rate of the preceding three years instead of the 8.5% rate applied by the ld. CIT(A). The dispute arose from the rejection of the books of account and the subsequent estimation of GP, with the Tribunal finding the lack of a proper basis for the 8.5% rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 02:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 759 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and allowed the cross objection by the assessee. The Tribunal directed the AO to apply the GP estimated at the average rate of the preceding three years instead of the 8.5% rate applied by the ld. CIT(A). The dispute arose from the rejection of the books of account and the subsequent estimation of GP, with the Tribunal finding the lack of a proper basis for the 8.5% rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>