<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 872 - ITAT, Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of scrap sales in total turnover for deduction under sec.80HHC, disallowing the inclusion of interest income, cutter-re-sharpening charges, and export incentives. It ruled replacement costs of dies as revenue expenditure, allowed 100% depreciation on civil works, and disallowed ASEAN project expenses. The Tribunal vacated the retrospective application of Rule 8D for disallowance under sec.14A. Deductions for work-in-progress and other expenses were granted, and the addition towards sales tax deferral loan was deleted. Disallowance of processing fees and consultancy payments to non-residents was overturned. The appeals and cross-appeals were decided accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 02:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 872 - ITAT, Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of scrap sales in total turnover for deduction under sec.80HHC, disallowing the inclusion of interest income, cutter-re-sharpening charges, and export incentives. It ruled replacement costs of dies as revenue expenditure, allowed 100% depreciation on civil works, and disallowed ASEAN project expenses. The Tribunal vacated the retrospective application of Rule 8D for disallowance under sec.14A. Deductions for work-in-progress and other expenses were granted, and the addition towards sales tax deferral loan was deleted. Disallowance of processing fees and consultancy payments to non-residents was overturned. The appeals and cross-appeals were decided accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>