<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 605 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207846</link>
    <description>Receipts termed &quot;deemed generation&quot; charges paid by a power purchaser when it could not offtake electricity were held to have a direct nexus with the eligible industrial undertaking, because they compensated fixed costs necessarily incurred to keep the plant in ready condition and arose only due to the undertaking&#039;s generation-and-sale arrangement; deduction under s.80IA was therefore allowable on such income. Provision for bad debts was held to be a provision for diminution in the value of an asset within Expln.1 to s.115JB as amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2009, requiring add-back to net profit for computation of book profit; the assessee&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 605 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207846</link>
      <description>Receipts termed &quot;deemed generation&quot; charges paid by a power purchaser when it could not offtake electricity were held to have a direct nexus with the eligible industrial undertaking, because they compensated fixed costs necessarily incurred to keep the plant in ready condition and arose only due to the undertaking&#039;s generation-and-sale arrangement; deduction under s.80IA was therefore allowable on such income. Provision for bad debts was held to be a provision for diminution in the value of an asset within Expln.1 to s.115JB as amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2009, requiring add-back to net profit for computation of book profit; the assessee&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>