<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 865 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207844</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271D. The decision was based on consistent legal principles and precedents indicating that penalties should not apply to transactions conducted through journal entries, aligning with previous ITAT rulings and a judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 865 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207844</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271D. The decision was based on consistent legal principles and precedents indicating that penalties should not apply to transactions conducted through journal entries, aligning with previous ITAT rulings and a judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>