<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 471 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207837</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellants in a service tax case, finding that a commission received before a certain date was wrongly included in the demand. The case was remitted for a fresh decision, granting the appellants a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The appeal was allowed through remand, overturning the initial demand of Rs.2,04,000/- along with interest and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 471 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207837</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellants in a service tax case, finding that a commission received before a certain date was wrongly included in the demand. The case was remitted for a fresh decision, granting the appellants a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The appeal was allowed through remand, overturning the initial demand of Rs.2,04,000/- along with interest and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>