https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207825 Loss of excisable sugar occurring during reprocessing did not fall within Rule 21, because the goods were not lost or destroyed by natural causes, unavoidable accident, or becoming unfit for consumption or marketing. On that basis, remission under Rule 21 was not required, and no duty was payable on the quantity lost in reprocessing. The resulting demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable. en-us Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207825 Loss of excisable sugar occurring during reprocessing did not fall within Rule 21, because the goods were not lost or destroyed by natural causes, unavoidable accident, or becoming unfit for consumption or marketing. On that basis, remission under Rule 21 was not required, and no duty was payable on the quantity lost in reprocessing. The resulting demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207825