<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 130 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207820</link>
    <description>Income from dry cleaning charges was examined under export and industrial undertaking deduction provisions. The article states that deduction under Section 80-HCC was unavailable because the receipt was not shown to form part of export turnover and the scheme required profits derived from export business. It also explains that Section 80-I requires a direct and proximate nexus with the industrial undertaking, and that the expression &quot;derived from&quot; is narrower than &quot;attributable to&quot;. As the record did not show that the dry cleaning activity formed part of the manufacturing process, the receipts were treated as ineligible for deduction under Section 80-I.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 130 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207820</link>
      <description>Income from dry cleaning charges was examined under export and industrial undertaking deduction provisions. The article states that deduction under Section 80-HCC was unavailable because the receipt was not shown to form part of export turnover and the scheme required profits derived from export business. It also explains that Section 80-I requires a direct and proximate nexus with the industrial undertaking, and that the expression &quot;derived from&quot; is narrower than &quot;attributable to&quot;. As the record did not show that the dry cleaning activity formed part of the manufacturing process, the receipts were treated as ineligible for deduction under Section 80-I.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>