<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 408 - ITAT, Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207816</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all contested issues, including the deletion of disallowances related to syndication charges/guarantee fee, staff welfare expenses, brokerage expenses, and deduction under Section 36(1)(viii). The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning sound and supported by evidence. The order was pronounced on 5.5.2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 408 - ITAT, Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207816</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all contested issues, including the deletion of disallowances related to syndication charges/guarantee fee, staff welfare expenses, brokerage expenses, and deduction under Section 36(1)(viii). The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning sound and supported by evidence. The order was pronounced on 5.5.2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>