<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 758 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207805</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT, Mumbai partly allowed the appeal regarding the rejection of the claim of long-term capital loss. It emphasized the appellant&#039;s rights in the disputed land, leading to the acknowledgment of long-term capital loss. The issues of disallowance under section 14A and section 36(1)(iii) were either dismissed or not pressed during the hearing, resulting in no further consideration or alteration of the original orders on these matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 758 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207805</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT, Mumbai partly allowed the appeal regarding the rejection of the claim of long-term capital loss. It emphasized the appellant&#039;s rights in the disputed land, leading to the acknowledgment of long-term capital loss. The issues of disallowance under section 14A and section 36(1)(iii) were either dismissed or not pressed during the hearing, resulting in no further consideration or alteration of the original orders on these matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>