<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 774 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207798</link>
    <description>Section 11 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 permits the government to apply only selected provisions to an existing inquiry body, and the deeming fiction does not automatically import Sections 8B and 8C when they are omitted by notification. The noticee therefore cannot an independent right to copies of documents, legal representation, or cross-examination unless those safeguards are specifically applied. The general principle of audi alteram partem also yields where the statutory scheme reflects a deliberate exclusion of those procedural protections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 774 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207798</link>
      <description>Section 11 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 permits the government to apply only selected provisions to an existing inquiry body, and the deeming fiction does not automatically import Sections 8B and 8C when they are omitted by notification. The noticee therefore cannot an independent right to copies of documents, legal representation, or cross-examination unless those safeguards are specifically applied. The general principle of audi alteram partem also yields where the statutory scheme reflects a deliberate exclusion of those procedural protections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>