<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 619 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207796</link>
    <description>The High Court held that detention triggers the time limit under the Customs Act, allowing the owner to seek remedies from the date of detention, even without a formal seizure order. The Court disagreed with the Single Judge&#039;s view that there is no time limit for issuing a seizure order. The appeal was disposed of with modifications, emphasizing the importance of due process in detaining consignments and allowing the appellant to seek remedies in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 619 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207796</link>
      <description>The High Court held that detention triggers the time limit under the Customs Act, allowing the owner to seek remedies from the date of detention, even without a formal seizure order. The Court disagreed with the Single Judge&#039;s view that there is no time limit for issuing a seizure order. The appeal was disposed of with modifications, emphasizing the importance of due process in detaining consignments and allowing the appellant to seek remedies in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>